AECOM (ACM)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 FY25 delivered record adjusted EPS ($1.34) and adjusted EBITDA ($312.8M), with segment adjusted operating margin at 17.1% and adjusted EBITDA margin at 17.6% on NSR, as backlog and pipeline reached all‑time highs .
- EPS beat Wall Street consensus while revenue missed: EPS $1.34 vs $1.26*; revenue $4.18B vs $4.33B*; management raised FY25 guidance for adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EPS, and margins for the third straight quarter .
- Americas NSR grew 8% with a 20.5% adjusted operating margin; International NSR grew 3% with 11.9% margin; both segments maintained 1.0x book‑to‑burn and backlog records, underscoring visibility .
- Cash conversion remained strong (FCF $262M), net leverage at 0.6x, and YTD capital returns nearly $240M; a $0.26 quarterly dividend was declared payable July 18, 2025 .
- Call tone: confident on sustained margin expansion (AI adoption, capability centers, advisory/program management mix), but Q4 will carry elevated BD expense to pursue record pipeline—watch for near‑term margin phasing .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Record profitability: adjusted EPS ($1.34) and adjusted EBITDA ($312.8M) set quarterly highs; segment adjusted operating margin reached 17.1% on NSR and adjusted EBITDA margin 17.6% on NSR . “We set new records for NSR, margins, EBITDA, EPS, backlog and pipeline.” — CEO Troy Rudd .
- Americas strength and mix: NSR +8% Y/Y; adjusted operating margin rose 120 bps to 20.5%, driven by high‑return organic investments and growing advisory contributions .
- Visibility and conversion: backlog and pipeline at all‑time highs; 19th consecutive >1.0x book‑to‑burn; YTD FCF +27% with $262M in Q3; net leverage 0.6x .
-
What Went Wrong
- Top‑line vs consensus: Q3 revenue of $4.18B came in below Street ($4.33B*), continuing a pattern of revenue underperforming estimates even as EPS beats persist [GetEstimates].
- International mixed: NSR +3% with U.K./Middle East strength, but Australia decline weighed on regional revenue; management flagged near‑term transport pauses in Australia and budget challenges in U.K. transportation .
- Q4 margin phasing: management signaled higher business development spend in Q4 to pursue record pipeline, implying a typical seasonal step‑down vs Q3 at the midpoint .
Financial Results
Quarterly trend (oldest → newest)
Note: Margins reported on NSR basis as disclosed .
Q3 2025 vs S&P Global consensus
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown – Q3 2025 vs Q3 2024
KPIs and balance sheet (Q3 2025)
Guidance Changes
We must correct this. Provide two margin guidance metrics:
-
inline to Q2: segment adjusted operating margin 16.1% per Q2; Q baseline 16 pipeline Q3 16.5%. Provide citations.
-
adjusted EBITDA margin to 16.3% Q2; Q3 16.7%. Provide citations.
Continue table:
Let's write:
We must ensure NB: share count—Q2 PR: NB the doc: "An average fully diluted share count of 134 million" , Q3 PR: " pipeline 133 million" .
Now produce table with correct values.
CN
Let's continue final answer building now with the rest.